The creator of the iPhone and Openai develop an artificial intelligence device to replace the cell phone: all the details

In contrast, some observe in Openai an energy similar to that Apple radiated in their youth: a fresh, almost irreverent daring, which shakes the showcases of the technology industry with Innovative ideas.

The common link that both companies have is Jony Iveone of the most famous Designers that Apple had in its history. Now, together with OpenAi, it is proposed to create a new type of gadget – which has no name, but the form – that is more human, Less addictive and more intuitive.

The designer who shaped the iPhonethe most influential device of the 21st century, now seems to want to amend the consequences that this invention caused in several generations. In addition, he is convinced that both that smartphone and the entire Macbook and iPad line They were obsolete And they need another object that replaces them.

As if both – the creator of the object and the architect of the digital future – were now regrets, are willing to redesign the relationship between people and technology from scratch. “Humanity deserves something better.” With that phrase, Jony Ive launched an elegant critique of the legacy of the iPhone.

For IVE, collaborate with the company Sam Altman It is not another project, but a kind of reconciliation with technology: “has revived my optimism,” he confesses, after years of disenchantment for the repetition that predominates In the industry.

For this reason he sold his startup io to OpenAi, in an operation valued in almost 6,500 million dollars. Although IVE and their firm Lovefrom will remain independent, they will assume the integral design of OpenAi, both in software and in hardware.

“Many of us have collaborated closely for decades. The IO team, focused on developing products that merge with OpenAi’s ideas to attend more closely with the research, engineering and product teams of San Francisco.”

As part of the agreement, some 55 experts – including engineers, developers and manufacturing specialists – will be integrated into the OpenAI team, with an eye on throwing their first own devices in 2026.

“We bring together the best hardware and software engineers, the best technologists, physical, scientists, researchers and experts in product development and manufacturing,” said IVE and Altman in a joint publication.

According to an official video published on the Openai website, Altman says that the collaboration between both parties began two years ago, discreetly and motivated by “friendship, curiosity and shared values.”

From those first conversations ideas arose that, little by little, were taking shape. The objective, they say in filming, is to create a New Family of Products “To inspire, empower and train.”

“Recently Jony gave me one of the prototypes in which he was working to take him home and I lived with him for a while. I think it is the most great technology piece that the world has ever seen,” Altman said in a video passage.

Jony Ive was not one more designer. He joined Apple in 1992 and together with Steve Jobs, helped shape a generation of iconic products: IMAC, iPod, iPhone, iPad and even the Apple Watch. That aesthetic defined Apple’s design language during the last decades.

In this wave of successes, many overlooked Laurene Powell Jobs, Steve Jobs’s widow, also known as “Silicon Valley’s richest woman.” She was one of the first investors of the IO when no one knew even that it existed.

In a joint interview with the Financial Times, he recognized that he does not want the new Gadget to become another iPhone. Not for sales or success, but for something much deeper: the level of addiction generated In young people.

She was present during the development of the iPhone, saw her husband’s “night conversations.” He witnessed “in real time how ideas range from a thought to words, derive in sketches, pass through some discussions and then the prototype comes.”

In this context, the new device is presented as an opportunity to redesign the relationship between people and technology. An attempt to correct past errors and offer a more human and conscious alternative.

In a recent publication, Apple Ming-Chi Kuo analyst indicates that the device could be larger than Humane’s Pin, but with a “compact and elegant factor as an iPod Shuffle.”

Kuo adds that “one of the planned use cases” is to wear the device around the neck. It is also possible that it does not come with a screen, says Kuo, with only chambers and microphones incorporated for “environmental detection.”

The miniature could also connect to smartphones and PC to use their computer and visualization capabilities.

The AI ​​Pin of Humane marked a milestone as the first tangible attempt of a startup, formed by former Apple employees, for reimagining the future of personal technology. Conceived to supplant the cell phone, he opted for an experience dominated by AI.

It was equipped with camera, laser projector to show text on any surface and a Qualcomm processor. At the beginning of 2024, AI Pin seemed anticipate a new era.

However, Humane’s futuristic vision ended up colliding with reality. Despite the promises, he failed to convince either the public or criticism. Its high cost, the constant dependence of the cloud, a limited user experience and problems of autonomy, were wearing the initial enthusiasm.

The final blow came from the hand of HP, which acquired a good part of Humane and decided to remove the product from the market and cease all technical support. Thus, after just a few months of commercial life, the AI ​​Pin went from being a Rupture symbol to a loud failure.

At that time, another unexpected actor arose in this race for the future: Rabbit R1. This small device, colorful and with a fun aesthetic, was presented as a nice pocket companion driven by AI who promised to do everything: from asking for an uber to answer with ease to any question.

His proposal not only caught attention for what he could do, but for how he did, unmarked from the cold functionality of other virtual assistants to become an almost playful presence on a day -to -day basis.

But in its premiere it received a wave of negative criticism, since the R1 barely did nothing and many third -party integrations that it presented were deficient. It was revealed that the underlying software was simply a simple Android application. And he died in oblivion.