The Supreme Court put an end to the claims of the apartment owners in the evacuated settlements of the north of Israel, demanding from the state to compensate them for a rent lost due to the war.
The judges of the Supreme Court ruled that the legislation regarding compensation for indirect damage during the war does not include the loss of rent within the framework of private lease.
At the same time, Judge David Mints noted that “there are grounds for approving applicants that it is necessary to develop a comprehensive agreement that will ensure an adequate decision for private landlords who have lost income due to the evacuation of tenants from the conflict zones.” However, this issue, in his opinion, “is in the competence of the government and is not included in the jurisdiction of this court.”
It should be noted that the lessons of the Supreme Court were injured, who did not communicate the tax administration about their income from renting a rental (this is allowed by law if the income from the rent does not exceed 5654 shekels per month).