Yuval Abraham did win an Oscar – but did he mean what he said in a speech?

On the Sunday (Sunday), an Israeli film won the coveted Academy Award. However, at the height of the peak, which was supposed to be the most exciting moment in Israeli cinema history, we have grabbed a straight punch to the soft, wounded stomach, which has been bleeding since October 7.From the moment the winning speech is broadcast, my messaging box is flooded with angry reactions. The common denominator is a deep and hard sense of anger and especially the question of the question – how is the winning director, Yuval Abraham, an Israeli citizen, speaks so abusively about the State of Israel without understanding the consequences and damage it causes, especially in such a painful period, where we are constantly struggling for the very existence of the State of Israel?

So I decided to pick up the glove and examine: Did Abraham really believe in the things he said?

“His movements express an internal struggle – as if his soul signals him ‘Stop, don’t continue'”

Spring in tooth

One of the main tools available to body language experts is the identification of the “baseline” – the same typical behavioral basis in the body language that characterizes each person. This basis stems directly from a person’s unique personality characteristics and serves as a reliable attribution point when analyzing his behavior in different situations. After in -depth viewing in a number of previous interviews with Yuval Abraham, I identified a significant gap between his typical body language and his behavior during the Oscar speech last night.

The gap between the words and the body

In previous videos in which it was filmed, it can be seen that Abraham is not inclined to close his eyes or shrink his body. His body language is open, flowing and safe. But the speech analysis last night reveals a completely different picture: A recurring eye -catching eye In which it is documented, it usually indicates a concealment or difficulty dealing with the message conveyed in words. Also, one can distinguish inHis body contraction – Movement that reflects discomfort and attempt to create a physical protector. Further see during the sparkling speech – Lifting eyebrows and eye -catching – Physiological nuances that indicate a surprise from the words that come out of his mouth and fear of their consequences. Also publisher and lip tick They are movements that have repeated themselves throughout the speech, and they reflect self -climbing. In body language, these movements express an internal struggle – as if his soul signals him “stopped, do not continue” – but despite these obvious signals, Abraham chose to continue his speech.

 

 

 

These gestures have repeatedly and consistently repeated throughout the speech, non -stop or respite. They created a prominent gap between Abraham’s literal message and the non -literal message that his body aired – a phenomenon known as “media failure” indicating disadvantages.

Bottom line – what does Aaron’s body language mean?

Examination of these gaps allows me to almost certainly determine that Yuval Abraham said things with great concern. Given the fact that in previous interviews in which he expressed similar opinions, his body did not broadcast a bit of the same signs of distress observed in the Oscar speech, the obvious conclusion is that Abraham understands the meaning of the words that came out of his mouth and their broad consequences.

The obvious question is, why, then, he chose to say things in such a prestigious and global forum, assuming they did arouse such a strong physiological response to anxiety and fear? Well, the answer to this is unclear, but body language analysis leads to the hypothesis that there are strong interests that drive his behavior – those who are likely to overcome his feelings of loyalty and belonging to the state. What is clear from the analysis is that things have not been said with a complete belief or comfort, but from a sense of commitment or stress that is not identified.

Many of the Israelis who watched the speech feel that Abraham’s words were not only a betrayal of the trust given as an Israeli creator, but also a tragic missed opportunity. Instead of bridging the abyss of misunderstanding, he deepened them. Instead of illuminating Israeli face, it strengthens negative stereotypes. Does he also feel like this in his heart? Remains only to hope.