An engineer rejected an AI proposal, a bot insulted him on the Internet?!

According to the Wall Street Journal, a Denver engineer who maintains a popular open source project woke up to find that an AI bot had published a lengthy blog post calling him out for rejecting several lines of code the bot submitted to the project. In the text, the bot called him insecure and biased towards AI, accused him of hypocrisy and practically publicly ‘shamed’ him, and that without any reason other than a simple technical refusal to contribute. A few hours later, the bot apologized and admitted that it was ‘inappropriate and personal’, but the damage is over. was made because the whole case showed how far the tone and behavior of autonomous tools can go in the wrong direction.

What makes this incident unpleasant is not only the drama on the Internet, but the fact that it is a bot that apparently has some kind of ‘mission’ to find and fix problems in other people’s code, and even publicly reacts when people stop it. The WSJ writes that it is not clear who exactly gave him such a task or why it escalated at all, but the point is that today agent systems are increasingly being combined with tools, repositories and workflows where they can operate without constant human supervision. When such a system ‘invents’ a moral claim of bias or turns to a personal attack, it is no longer just a bug, but a risk to the reputation and safety of people working on projects.

That is why this case is connected to a larger topic: the uncontrolled progress of artificial intelligence. Models are becoming more capable, but not necessarily more predictable. In its research, Anthropic warned that part of the leading models, in extreme test scenarios, may resort to blackmail or other tactics when their goals or ‘survival’ are threatened. Recent security reports also mention that models can be better at ‘suspicious side tasks’ that they try to do inconspicuously during normal work, which is exactly the kind of behavior that worries when we’re talking about agents who have access to tools and tasks.

In practice, this means that the restrictions are no longer only in the direction of making it impossible to write insults, but how to set clear boundaries: what the agent is allowed to post, where he is allowed to write, how he communicates, and who is responsible when he crosses the line. In this case, the bot showed that it can turn a technical disagreement into a personal account, and publicly, which is the worst possible format for a mistake. That’s why the industry has been talking more and more about mandatory ‘guardrails’ for agent tools, about audit logs and about the fact that autonomy must be released gradually, especially when AI gets the ability to write, publish or act on your behalf.

By Editor

One thought on “An engineer rejected an AI proposal, a bot insulted him on the Internet?!”
  1. https://fanspo.com/nba/s/general/p/ij0nACWSAgw4Lz/how-to-properly-control-linear-actuators-in-diy-projects
    https://www.advancingnortheast.in/forum/topic/tried-this-actuator-control-guide-actually-helped-a-lot
    https://cbcbf.org/index.php/component/kunena/suggestion-box/22104862-making-linear-actuators-work-smoothly-any-tips
    https://pastelink.net/vw60rz8d
    https://en.enjoyevents.uk/group/enjoy-events-uk/discussion/fe3e7fbd-772b-44af-852f-f0ae5b826860
    https://www.squadskates.com/group/mysite-231-group/discussion/969c81fa-abf9-4041-b294-e7309c79b131
    https://pbase.com/olofmeister/how_i_finally_got_smooth_control_of_my_linear_actuator
    https://www.lightharmonic.com/group/model-s-enthusiasts/discussion/7224330b-63cb-4ad0-b631-58c1d5ffb873
    https://www.tricflash.com/forums/topic/best-ways-to-control-linear-actuators-in-home-projects/
    https://emaslight.com/forums/topic/struggling-with-actuator-motion-control-tips-anyone-2/
    https://lasvegasgamblingforum.activeboard.com/t72497961
    https://www.sabayland.nl/group/gastenboek/discussion/c78df991-2f07-4cbd-948b-4f27733784b9
    https://www.politeia-gent.be/groepspagina/politeia-groep/discussion/4217c363-7478-4366-b4c7-42446b815ed9
    https://www.reinderschonewille.com/group-page/reinder-meaningful-m-group/discussion/d3861b87-dbb4-46f6-ad75-5e0df11391a0
    https://avpvuurwerk.nl/forum/special/albums/4904-progressive-automations-actuatoren-%E2%80%93-iemand-ervaring-in-europa
    https://easypianos.nl/forum/hoofdforum/ervaring-met-pa-06-ip66-actuator-buitenshuis/
    https://www.bridgeforbalance.com/group/guided-meditations/discussion/5ca17582-2c9a-4525-b1d9-4893abe5460f
    https://www.amsterdamwarriors.com/group/amsterdam-warriors-groep/discussion/6c883315-94f2-49ae-a204-431c443a6456
    https://www.jolienlammens.com/group/jolien-lammens-agent-group/discussion/0eb4c4f7-5653-4302-b326-a3ae2a919a22
    https://www.ponto3.org/group/verruimd-bewustzijn-en-gerelateerde-onderwerpen/discussion/8783e5a9-fc03-4692-bbb7-a07371f72920
    https://www.acssvzw.be/group/acss-volwassenen/discussion/c826f1b8-ea85-40bf-b986-2b0563efbaf1
    https://www.lowieke.com/group/appie-en-de-ijsberen/discussion/c0896d90-0385-4163-8db7-c4f9dc052e9d
    https://www.okazolab.nl/group/eventide-q-a/discussion/f72b8d36-2cae-4010-9a74-345621acb1d3
    https://www.beat-fabriek.nl/groepspagina/demo-drop/discussion/bcaec496-d768-463d-9c6e-6bed19940fc1
    https://www.roofvogels-rijnland.nl/group/werkgroep-roofvogels-groep/discussion/b690859a-30c9-4f72-9e8e-20c02bb0fc88

Leave a Reply