These words will be heard right: an excited constitutional crisis, the executive authority is a frontal conflict with the judiciary; Dusts arise if it is a court; The impression is that she has finished concentrating more power than he has ever been dedicated; Fateful decisions are about to fall in the Supreme Court, could the executive authority not obey them?
Of course, this happens in the US. A combination of circumstances? There is almost no need to prove the effect of the Trump Revolution in America on the course of thought, and probably also jealousy, of Israeli leaders.
The American drama does not approach the same excitement that Israeli drama raises. The big cities streets are not full of protesters. Inter -urban roads are not blocked. No one is sorry for the White House or the Congress residence. In Washington, the capital did not take a protest outside of the power corridors in Congress (if any). No one speaks on this side of the Atlantic about a general strike or taxpayer. It’s just not part of the American political folklore.
But the severity of the events is undeniable. She brought Supreme Court President John Roberts to scold the President Donald Trump, without accepting his name, and remind him that under the rule of law, failure to agree with judges is resolved through an appeal for their decisions, not a call for rejection.
Roberts has been conducting the court for 20 years and more, since the previous Republican president, George Bush Jr.. He is therefore not suspected of instinctively in the president. On the contrary, the court granted Trump even during his first term and expanded the constitutional definition of president’s powers. The court granted the president almost complete immunity from a legal claim. But Roberts is not ready to give the president an exemption from legal supervision. These days in Washington, such supervision is not obvious.
Caution is from the devil
Trump Azz Road. He wants to move forward at a dizzying speed: to bend all the federal government’s bodies to his full and direct will, without any exceptions; To reduce the size of the government drastically; Begin mass expulsion of non -legal immigrants, but also of legal immigrants without citizenship; Mostly change the priorities of foreign policy and foreign trade.
On the way to this historic revolution, he encounters a huge collection of legal obstacles from the first day. He knew he would encounter, even because he had their shoulders during his first presidency, and because his advisers had preceded him to warn him – and also offered a treatment formula.
They told him that the caution was from the devil, and the more it was – the better. Appeals will come from all over. It is easy to appeal in the US. Thus, Republican prosecutors also used by President Joe Biden and Barack Obama. Appeals also come from professional unions and on the grounds of human rights and civil rights organizations.
There are lawyers in the right of Israeli law in the politicization of American law. They want politicians to appoint judges, or even local judges will be selected in direct elections, as in the US parts.
“These judges want to take the presidency’s powers without winning 80 million votes” (basically, 77.3 million), he says. The “extreme left -wing judges,” who publish “illegal orders,” are “crazy, who don’t even care about what the results of their dangerous decisions and their erroneous rulings will be: the destruction of our country!”
“Take care of this toxic state”
Mired complaints about judges are a constitutional bread of American politics, but no president dared to call them. The impeachment is a beautifully complicated process that is slim.
Trump, therefore, calls the Supreme Court “to take care of this toxic state,” where “licensed radical and party judges are allowed to fail justice.”
In order for the Supreme Court to deliver the sought -after poison, the government’s appeal for the orders of the above judges must first reach it. This is an important explanation for the multiplicity of controversial presidential orders.
The administration usually undermines the basis of the claim that judges were not authorized to make decisions and failed to exaggerate their power (overreach). The American right has been complaining for decades on “activist judges,” a term that is also adopted in the language of the Israeli right. Strong on a significant portion of the appeals that will reach the Supreme Court.
Two -thirds of court judges are identified with the right. Trump appointed three of them. But he cannot automatically trust this majority, as there has been a final ruling of the upper, when two of the “conservative”, in which the court president, made one hand with the three “liberal”. The court judges are appointed throughout their lives, and they tend to discover independence, even when it does not align with the ideological expectations of the presidents.
“Wall Street Journal,” whose vaporism put him in the rigid right wing of American politics, warns Trump that his attacks on the Supreme Court will yield the opposite of the mikvah. The President’s hit to get rid of brakes strengthens the judge’s determination to enforce the 237 years of constitution.
The critical question is whether the president is preparing to ignore the courts. He is in mind that he always obeys and adds to obey. But is it? Isn’t this a patriotic need to deny the decisions of judges who threaten to “destroy our country”? Trump’s deputy, JOD VI rap, tweeted a month and a half ago that “judges are not allowed to control the president’s legitimate authority.”
Since this tweet, the Trump administration has disappeared at least twice twice of courts, though not explicitly. Explicit disregard will change the equation.
In the American Republic of years, historical memory is sometimes very far away. Lawyers are looking for warning signs in 1832. Then, the Supreme Court, led by John Marshall, ruled against President Andrew Jackson with a critical question that touched the rights of the “Indian natives”.
Jackson responded at the time: “John Marshall decided, so he would enforce his decision.” The Supreme Court has never been the power to enforce. Jackson then put out the best -known deportation of Indians, the one known as “through the tears.”
Donald Trump is known for his admiration for President Jackson. visible.