El fiscal federal Carlos Rívolo criminally denounced the head of the National Civil Aviation Administration, María Julia Cordero, Already two other officials of that state agency, as well as the CEO of Flybondi, Mauricio very much And four other executives of this airline, after an investigation in which, according to the complaint, it was proven that Flybondi He repeatedly used repairs and maintenance workshops of his planes that had been closed by ANAC itself.
Rívolo’s complaint was in charge of the federal judge and candidate for the Supreme Court, Arielieor, head of the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4. The prosecutor designated to carry out the complaint (Rívolo is the complainant) is the prosecutor Carlos Stornelli.
Rívolo began his investigation, as stated in the 69 veneers of his complaint, in a series of articles published by the specialized site Aviation in Argentina. In those notes, signed by the journalist Diego DominelliRívolo slogans that “12/12/2024 wrote the following post:“ Research! Flybondi with his Ezeiza workshop suspended by ANAC did 37 maintenance tasks in his aircraft as if nothing happened. ”The series of notes consigned by Rívolo highlighted, they also recorded a defect in one of Flybondi’s airplanes“ it had to be on the ground (following a damage in a windshield) but continued to fly ”.
From these journalistic notes, Rívolo cited to declare six inspectors of the ANAC who participated in the different inspections in the Flybondi workshops: the six said that the company had continued with tasks within facilities that were suspended. And five of the six inspectors added that this procedure “It affected operational security” of the company.
AAC spokesmen, consulted by the denunciation of the Rívolo prosecutor against its headline and other officials, said: “Although the ANAC was not notified of the complaint made (it still did not enter into the entrances), we are analyzing it and preparing all the corresponding documents to make available to justice.”
They added: “We will present all the evidence that demonstrates that Anac fulfilled its role as an inspection and that the corresponding inspections were carried out from the Directorate of Aircraft, belonging to the National Directorate of Operational Security of the ANAC, of the Flybondi TAR, both in Aeroparque and in Ezeiza and that, in the face guaranteeing at all times the operational security of the system ”.
From Flybondi, on the other hand, they replied: “We were not formally notified of any complaint but if we will be available to present all the corresponding documentary support that It shows that the company fulfilled everything required by the ANAC. ”