Scientific studies get to the bottom of things in the constant struggle with statistical adversity, critical colleagues and limited research time.
But sometimes they reach deeper truths that amaze people, spread by the media to the masses!
Now a team of researchers has…
with 2330 people who voluntarily obeyed
examined and judged according to their judgment,
whether ChatGPT or humans write poetry better.
In the journal “Scientific Reports” they report today,
that, as it turned out, most people
the lines devised by men,
prefer those spun by the PC.
I agree that the external content can be displayed to me. This means that personal data can be transmitted to third-party platforms. You can find more information about this in the data protection settings. You can find these at the bottom of our page in the footer, so you can manage or revoke your settings at any time.
From the perspective of the test subjects, the language model was better, more emotional and original. Not even Shakespeare, as an old master, surpassed the artificial spirits for them.
They viewed small mistakes made by human poets as AI will-o-the-wisps. And they substantially underestimated the beauty of the language model poems.
Because when asked what they believed,
whose verses took their breath away,
They mostly thought of people and no one else
to circuit, prompt and intelligent software.
Anyone reading this far will probably already know that the previous lines rhyme wonderfully. (Well.) But poetry? None, everyone can see that, but they only come from a human pen.