Comment|From different decades, the enthusiasm is a huuha-tree, writes Jussi Lehmusvesi, a cultural journalist.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
From different decades, the enthusiasm is a huuha-tree, writes Jussi Lehmusvesi, a cultural journalist.
Sharing time over decades is artificial and it doesn’t make sense.
The glorification of the past can create a distorted picture of how things really are.
The past does not determine us, but the present, Lehmusvesi writes.
Olin recently watching the Q-Theater To a new rise play. It lives childhood in the 1990s Finland, colored by parents’ financial concerns, Kurt Cobain, I am i And the nintendo controllers.
In the interval, the children of the recession were talked about, of course. While listening to the audience, the children of the recession seemed to be in their thirties, in their forties and in their fifties.
It came to my mind that whose yard is being watched here.
Last In the years, the 1990s have been enthusiastic. Ysär’s fashion trends, such as grunge, flannel shirts and thick sneakers, are back in fashion, and the TV shows familiar from a decade have experienced rebirth or re-version.
Mirror surfaces and electric blue have been tacitized at the furniture fair.
Strongly, yeast seems to be fascinating in social media. The pictures show era toys, car brands, hit music, books and school dishes. And, of course, clothes like mini skirts, artificial leather pants, buttonhole, hairpins.
The joy of the joy of causing From police TV, From the shopping channel and What to pay program and ads for the R-kiosk and mammoth markets. The popularity is also collected by “schizo and” wake-up “words. Museum exhibitions have recently been in Vantaa and Kuopio.
Sikasist, the child of the recession would find a bottle of Moomin in his hand.
”
The difference between 1989 and 1990 is no greater than any two consecutive years.
For the fashion world, Reminding of the past decades for the media and art institutions and advertisers is an effective way to resell to consumers the past time again, but is wrapped in the desired form of history even violently.
For example, the 1970s have been described during the “death of great ideals”.
The 1980s was a “stupid, sudden decade.”
In addition to the bankruptcy wave, the 1990s brought with it a “digital revolution”.
And have you heard of the “happy 20s”?
Unfortunately, it refers to the 1920s, not the current decade.
Quickly Thinking about dividing the time over decades seems like a logical hustle: second, minute, hour, month, year, and so on.
In reality, however, there is no sense of reason. Time is a constant current and does not change when we move artificially from one decade to decade.
The difference between 1989 and 1990 is no greater than any two consecutive years. In addition, social, technological and cultural changes are slow and do not follow any time limits.
For example, the rise in digital technology mentioned, for example, began as early as the 1960s and cannot be restricted to any decade.
At the individual level, glorification of the past can also create a distorted picture of how things really are. Nostalgia is a man’s way of saying that the present is not enough, but sometimes there was something better.
Life is the best time for man, Matti Nykänen Said already in the yard.
The past does not determine us, but the present.