Corona vaccines The FDA in America is considering placing a severe warning against the vaccine

The spokesperson for the American Ministry of Health stated that any claim regarding a final decision is speculation, and that every safety issue is examined according to accepted scientific and regulatory processes. On the other hand, the lack of an official announcement, a public discussion or the convening of an external committee of experts arouses sharp criticism among researchers and former regulators.

The recently published data from the US Centers for Disease Control, the CDC, indicate a clear benefit in children as well. In the winter season 2024 to 2025, it was found that the corona vaccine significantly reduced visits to emergency rooms and emergency medicine centers. The effectiveness was estimated at about 76% in children between the ages of 9 months and 4 years, and about 56% between the ages of 5 and 17, compared to children who were not vaccinated.

The pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna reiterated the safety profile of the vaccines, noting that international monitoring systems, after more than a billion doses have been administered, have not identified new or unreported safety risks, including in pregnant women and children.

At the heart of the discussion is a rare complication of inflammation of the heart muscle, myocarditis, which was observed mainly among boys and young men after mRNA vaccinations, especially at the beginning of the vaccination campaigns, when the interval between the doses was short. According to CDC data, most cases recovered, no deaths or heart transplants were reported, and the incidence of the phenomenon decreased significantly after extending the interval between doses. However, the FDA has previously expanded the safety warnings in vaccine leaflets on this topic.

The scientific community warns that placing a “black box” warning could damage public trust and reduce vaccination, without presenting complete and transparent data. Researchers from leading universities claim that such a dramatic regulatory procedure requires public discussion, presentation of data and assessment of risks versus benefits, especially when it comes to a vaccine that has prevented many hospitalizations and deaths.

The minister who fights vaccines

During the corona epidemic, Kennedy claimed that mRNA vaccines were an experimental technology that had not been properly tested, and warned of serious damage to the heart, fertility and the immune system, claims that were not backed up by controlled data. He previously compared the forced vaccination policy, he said, to medical experiments carried out without consent, and even caused an uproar when he publicly compared the situation of the unvaccinated to historical persecution, a statement for which he later partially apologized. Kennedy also claimed that the corona vaccines do not prevent infection and therefore there is no justification for sweeping recommendations, despite data that indicated a reduction in severe morbidity, hospitalizations and mortality.

Over the years, Kennedy’s organization has filed petitions and legal initiatives demanding the cancellation of vaccine approvals, delaying vaccinations for children and re-examining long-approved vaccines, including routine childhood vaccinations. In recent weeks, a petition was even submitted calling for the licensing of the corona vaccines to be revoked on the grounds that the initial approval was given as part of an emergency and, according to the organization, did not meet full standards. These positions drew sharp criticism from associations of doctors, epidemiologists and former heads of health authorities, who claimed that his words and the lies he spread contribute to the spread of misleading information and damage to public trust in the health systems.