Courts & Ccaron Commission of the Croatian Football Federation of Na & Ccaron with Bertrand Layec published an analysis of situations from the 29th round of the Croatian Football League. According to their justice of this round, there were many mistakes of Croatian judges. The two are the absence of a red card for Jon Mersinja (situation No. 3) in the match against Dinamo and Lindon Selachi (Situation No. 5) in the match against Vara & Zcaron; Dina.
The announcement of the Court of Court & Ccaron Commission is transmitted in its entirety:
Situation no. 1: Gorica – Istria 1961 (53. And 84 minutes); Other & Zcaron; Uti Cardboard
After receiving the first & zcaron cardboard in the 53rd minute due to reckless start (GE & Zcaron), away & cacute; and the game & Ccaron; no. 26 made a new reckless start, hitting his rival with his foot. The judge showed him another & zcaron without hesitation;
According to our guidelines and our priority to protect the game & ccaron; the court and CCaron; the Commission is fully supported by this Decision on the Other & Zcaron;
Situation no. 2: Dinamo – Osijek (5th minute); penalty kick
After the shot from the corner, the ball crossed the penalty area and reached the guests & cacute; 8, who tried to shoot the door. Suddenly he fell to the ground. The judge, who was close to the situation, saw no offense of the homemade game & Ccaron. 25.
After a few repetitions, we can assume very soft contact on the right attack & ccaron. According to our guidelines, the commission of the Court of Court of Court of Court is not expected by the DOS & Dstro kick when there is very light contact with rivals in the penalty area.
For this technique, for this CCARON consideration & CCaron; the commission agrees with the judge’s decision not to award a criminal blow.
Situation no. 3: Dinamo – Osijek (38 minutes); the situation “a likely opportunity to score”
When the homemade is attacked & Ccaron; No.16 Tr & Ccaron toward the away door; im the door, at about 30 meters away, visiting & Cacute; and defending & Ccaron; No.15 He shook him with his hands. The referee estimated this tactic misdemeanor by interrupting the promise of both the attacks for the position of the attack & Ccaron; in the moment when the offense was made (completely on the left) and the direction of the ball.
According to the rules of the football game, the Court of & Ccaron does not consider this situation by interrupting the promise; deny the opinion of o & ccaron. He quickly ran toward the door, and there was no additional defender & Ccaron.
According to our considerations, all the technique criteria are met:
– Position of attack & ccaron; and in the middle of the field
– The direction of movement toward the door
– The control of the ball attacks & Ccaron; a
– Brzina trzina trč where
Court & Ccaron Commission O & Ccaron.
Situation no. 4: Dinamo – Osijek (42 minutes); identity replacement
After the duel of the two rivals in the middle of the field, the judge is unsportsmanlike behavior (showing a handed to warn the rival. 20. According to our guidelines, all plays & cacaron; and which of the judges of the trailer and CCaron; who plays & caron; and must be admonished. Court & CCaron; towards the commission agrees with this disciplinary decision.
Seconds later, the judge punished & Zcaron, I was a cardboard of the homemade game & ccaron. 38 For the previous offense against the away game & Ccaron. 20. Unfortunately, the judge made a mistake by punishing the homemade; 38 instead of no. 10 who made an offense.
According to the VAR protocol, Var took control of the situation and informed the judge of his mistake. Budda & Ccaron was made up to a decision, the judge had canceled the allotted & zcaron. 38 and punished the homemade game properly & Ccaron. 10. The judge clearly showed the annulment & zcaron cardboard for the game & Ccaron. 38.
The Court and CCaron; to the Commission accepts and Cacute; and the intervention of VAR I & CCaron; the initial communication that the original disciplinary measure refers to the wrong game & caron; a.
Situation no. 5: Rijeka – Vara & Zcaron; Din (10 minutes); the situation “a likely opportunity to score”
After the return ball of the homemade defenses, they visit & Cacute; and attack & Ccaron; no. 22 made pressure on the homemade veteran & Ccaron. 18. Defense Game & Ccaron; He tried to break the ball with his right foot, but it was first touched by the attacks & Ccaron; Home & Cacute; and defend & Ccaron; has stopped with a careless motion with a rival on a chance to score. According to the rules of the football game, all the criteria are fulfilled to exclude the defense game & Ccaron: a:
– Position of attack & ccaron; and in the middle of the field
– The direction of movement toward the door
– The control of the ball attacks & Ccaron; a
– Brzina trzina trč where
The judge agreed with the criteria for red card, but the contact of the homemade veteran & Ccaron was not considered a foul.
Court & Ccaron Commission O & Ccaron. After reviewing the recording, the judge changes his poem and exclusion and the domestic veterans;
Situation no. 6: Rijeka – Vara & Zcaron; Din (54 minutes); other & zcaron;
After receiving the first & zcaron cardboard in 26 min. Due to reckless offense, the homemade; and the game & Ccaron; no. 6 made a new overwhelming offense. The judge did not immediately award a free kick due to the adhesive advantage to the guests & cacute; After the ball was out of the game, the referee reprimanded the homemade game & Ccaron. 6 due to the overbearing start.
Court & Ccaron Commission fully supported by another & zcaron cardboard.
Situation no. 7: Hajduk – locomotive (65 minutes); The situation “a chance to score”
When the game took place outside the penalty area of the homemade (approx. 20 meters), guests & cacute; and attack & Ccaron; no. 14 He shot the goal. Home & Cacute; and goalkeeper no. 13, who left his penalty area, stretched out his left hand to stop the ball direction.
There was a need for a goal to score in a natural position and the goalkeeper increased his body;
Court & CCaron; towards the Commission fully supported by the decision of the judge in the field.