Health|Genes can bring a gut, but they do not usually determine our future.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
Lifestyle and other environmental factors explain health, aging rate and the risk of premature death more than the genome.
This is how research led by the British Oxford University, based on the information of nearly half a million people.
However, inheritance factors explain the emergence of memory diseases and certain cancers more than lifestyle.
There were 22 illnesses under review. Smoking was related to everyone except one illness.
Sukurasitemany people think if some cardiovascular disease hits their own point. The disease is easily placed on the peak of the genes. The same idea applies to many other diseases.
But how much of our inheritance and our lifestyle really affect our health, aging and risk of death?
This is now being explored by the British Oxford University research. It will map with large material and extensive approach how much genus and environmental factors are important in human health issues.
The scale is clearly tilted to the environmental factors.
Lifestyle And according to the study, the habitat is more relevant to our health and aging than inheritance. Environmental factors are also significantly more related to the risk of premature death than our gene.
However, inheritance factors explain the emergence of memory, ovarian, prostate and intestinal cancers more than lifestyle.
On the contrary, the matter is in the heart, lung and liver diseases: lifestyle and other environmental factors are more important.
Researchers looked at 22 diseases that cause a lot of premature deaths and found out how strongly the genus and environmental factors were in contact with them.
The environment, lifestyle and living conditions were explained by a total of 17 % of the risk of death risk. The explanation of the genus was less than 2 %.
The study published in Nature Medicine is based on the information of nearly half a million people from British biobank.
Single In real life, people cannot distinguish between genes and environmental factors on their health.
In addition, lifestyle and heritage are in a complex interaction. The gut of a disease may be partly brought by genes, partly that lifestyle is often similar to family members and are inherited from parents to children.
Scientists summarized the environmental factors of 25 things. These included, for example, the level of education, household income, employment situation, sleeping, exercise, smoking, mental well-being, body weight at the age of ten, and whether a person lives in a ownership or rental home.
Biological aging was measured with new so -called aging watches that analyzing Certain proteins from the blood. Blood samples had been taken from more than 45,000 participants.
Smoking was associated with everyone except one illness in the study.
Mortality And biological aging was most strongly related to environmental factors in smoking, socio -economic status assessing education and income level, physical activity and living conditions.
Smoking was linked to 21 illnesses. Socio -economic factors, such as household income, home ownership and employment situation, were associated with 19 illnesses. Exercise was linked to 17 illnesses.
Living with a partner predicted a lower risk of death and a biological age younger than age.
Environmental factors can accelerate aging from an early age in life.
Weight at the age of ten and the mother’s smoking during pregnancy is associated with aging and what is the risk of premature death 30-80 years later.
At issue is an observational study. It does not prove that the two related issues are in a direct cause-and-effect relationship.
External experts have found the research to be of high quality, well done and even pioneering.
“It offers further evidence and supports previous research that in the vast majority of cases genes do not determine our future,” estimates For example, group leader at Cambridge University Stephen Burgess Science Media Center.