Due to corruption over the construction of ‘Imotski Tower’ detained reference Marijan Puljiz

The Imotski referee Marijan Puljiz on Friday determined the investigation of Uskok on the request of Uskok, which launched an investigation against him and & ccaron. aroma “or” Imotski Tower “.

The judge of the investigation of the Split & Zcaron Court was detained by Puljiz for the danger of the impact of witnesses and the possibilities of repetition of the crime.

Since the word & ccaron; The case of cacaron is the crime of Puljiza & Cacute, as it is learned, suspend on Monday at work for & Cacron; e as detention is to the danger of repeating the misdeeds of Pa & Cacute; e of Istra & zcaron; Ta & zcaronism of the examination of all about him and Zcaron.

Ta & Zcaronism reported that the investigation included two Croatian drankon at the age of 64 and 43 and two 56-year-olds and one 52-year-old who have Croatian and Bosnian & Ccaron; who Dr & Zcaron.

The media reported earlier that it was & Ccaron; About Imotski Lazine Darko Ore & Ccaron, Head of the Imotski Branch & Zcaron; the National Construction and Physical Office of Ivi & Zcaron, his former colleague Marijan Puljiz, Zagreb & Ccaron; buildings in Imotski.

Later, Slobodna Dalmacija pointed out that & Zcaron had fallen out of the defendant’s list after he gave Uskok a very detailed statement as a witness.

After writing about the cases of cases in late 2023 in the late 2023. issued a pododjek in Imotski “on the occasion of the request submitted by investors Darko Ora & Ccaron; from Zagreb, Tomislav Karamati & Cacute; from Posusje and Igor Petric from Fojnica, represented by Penunomo & Cacute; Josip Halapija from Zagreb”.

The Ministry then confirmed that they are determined by “irregularities in the process of enforcement of the Citizure in question; Evinal licenses in the treatment of the Service.

According to media reports, ccaron. said repeatedly that the building had all the necessary permits and that his only crime was that he wanted to realize this investment with his own money with his partners.

USKOK did not cite & cacute; and identities of suspects & ccaron, and the doubt that he had been suspected of agreeing to the trail of two residential buildings in Imotski and confronted by & Ccaron; ; and the construction of a residential multi -storey building near Blue Lake as a protection of the geomorphological monument of nature.