And if Trump is serious about Greenland? According to the EU, Denmark could request assistance

Would the USA Greenland If necessary, incorporate it by military force? The current debate stands or falls on this question. And as unimaginable as the option may seem, EU-wide strength against the USA’s territorial desires currently also includes at least trying out all options.

And so, after the inconclusive talks in Washington about US claims to ownership of the Arctic island, which from a European perspective are unjustified, a spokeswoman for the EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas made it clear: Yes, in the event of a violent conflict over Greenland, Germany and the other EU states could have to provide assistance at Denmark’s request.

Greenland is part of the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark and therefore in principle falls under the mutual solidarity clause in Article 42(7) of the EU Treaty, the spokeswoman said. At the same time, of course, she emphasized that the question of an application does not currently arise.

Clear announcement after a long silence

The public definition is still explosive. Previously, EU representatives had long avoided the question of whether Denmark could theoretically request the assistance of other member states in the event of the United States forcibly annexing Greenland. The reason is, among other things, that the Greenlanders voted in a referendum in 1982 to leave the then European Community (EC). At the same time, Greenland remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Some lawyers are also of the opinion that the solidarity clause probably does not apply to Greenland.

It specifically states: “In the event of an armed attack on the territory of a Member State, the other Member States owe it all the assistance and support in their power (…).”

Denmark cannot count on NATO in the dispute

Article 42 paragraph 7 is therefore worded even more strictly than Article 5 of NATO. According to this, the alliance states have discretion as to how they come to the aid of allies in the event of an attack. Denmark could not declare a NATO alliance anyway because the USA would also have to agree to it.

The clarification came shortly after Greenland talks ended unsuccessfully in Washington on Wednesday. At these meetings, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland Minister Vivian Motzfeldt, who is responsible for foreign policy, tried to make it clear to the Americans that the USA has no claim to Greenland and that the world’s largest island is not for sale.

Trump won’t let up

Immediately before the meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance, US President Donald Trump had once again made it clear that he was not thinking of giving up his interest in Greenland, which is rich in raw materials. He once again referred to strategic security interests of the United States that allegedly could not be protected by NATO.

Trump’s statements are causing a stir and concern, especially because he has not yet ruled out military coercion in order to gain control over Greenland. The island is four-fifths covered with ice and has an area of ​​more than two million square kilometers, but only has a population of just under 57,000.

After the exchange with Rubio and Vance, Rasmussen noted “fundamental” differences of opinion. As a sign of solidarity with Denmark and Greenland, numerous EU states have announced a military mission for the country.

By Editor